{"id":44,"date":"2019-04-02T12:11:19","date_gmt":"2019-04-02T10:11:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/?page_id=44"},"modified":"2022-03-01T17:07:26","modified_gmt":"2022-03-01T16:07:26","slug":"veroeffentlichungen","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/veroeffentlichungen\/","title":{"rendered":"Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen, in denen Open Science Praktiken angewandt wurden:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Prochazka, F. & Obermaier, M. (2022). Trust through Transparency? How Journalistic Reactions to Media-Critical User Comments Affect Quality Perceptions and Behavior Intentions. Digital Journalism, 1\u201321.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/21670811.2021.2017316<\/a>
Open Data: https:\/\/osf.io\/xqbu4\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Asberger, J., Thomm, E., & Bauer, J. (2020). Zur Erfassung fragw\u00fcrdiger \u00dcberzeugungen zu Bildungsthemen: Entwicklung und erste \u00dcberpr\u00fcfung des Questionable Beliefs in Education-Inventars (QUEBEC).\u00a0Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht<\/em>.\u00a0 http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2378\/peu2019.art25d<\/a> Open Material<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Haase, N., Schmid, P., & Betsch, C. (2020). Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions. Psychology & Health, 35<\/em>(3), 346\u2013365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08870446.2019.1630561<\/a>
Open Data: https:\/\/osf.io\/9efcg\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Schweppe, J. & Knigge, J. (2020). Irrelevant music: How suprasegmental changes of a melody\u2019s tempo and mode affect the disruptive potential of music on serial recall. Memory & Cognition<\/a>, 48(6)<\/em>, 982-993.  Open Data Open Material<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Schoemann, M, Schulte\u2010Mecklenbeck, M, Renkewitz, F, & Scherbaum, S. (2019). Forward inference in risky choice: Mapping gaze and decision processes. J Behav Dec Making<\/em>; 1\u2013 15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bdm.2129 <\/a>Open Data Open Materials<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meder, B., Nelson, J.D., Jones, M., & Ruggeri, A. (in press). Stepwise versus globally optimal search in children and adults. Cognition<\/em>. Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meder, B., Fleischhut, N., Krumnau, N.-C., & Waldmann, M. R. (2019). How should autonomous cars drive? A preference for defaults in moral judgments under risk and uncertainty. Risk Analysis, 39, 295\u2013314. Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Betsch, C. & B\u00f6hm, R. (2018). Moral values do not affect prosocial vaccination. Nature Human Behaviour<\/em>.<\/a> (open data, preregistration)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B\u00f6hm, R., Meier, N., Gro\u00df, M, Korn, L., Betsch, C. (2018). The willingness to vaccinate increases when vaccination protects others who have low responsibility for not being vaccinated. Journal of Behavioral Medicine<\/em><\/a>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10865-018-9985-9<\/a> Open Data Open Materials<\/a> Preregistered<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Betsch C, Schmid P, Heinemeier D, Korn L, Holtmann C, B\u00f6hm R (2018). Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLoS ONE<\/em> 13(12): e0208601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0208601 <\/a>Open Data Open Material<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Korn, L., Betsch, C., B\u00f6hm, R., Meier, N. (2018). Social nudging: The effect of social feedback interventions on vaccine uptake. Health Psychology<\/em><\/a>, 37(11):1045-1054. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1037\/hea0000668<\/a> Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eitze, S., Fleischmann-Struzek, C., Betsch, C., & Reinhart, K. (2018). Determinants of sepsis knowledge: a representative survey of the elderly population in Germany. Critical Care<\/em>, 22<\/em>(1), 273.Open Data Open Materials<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Heinemeier, D., Mei\u00dfner, C. & Betsch, C. (2018). Was bedeutet Evidenzbasierung\/<\/em>Evidenzinformierung in der Gesundheitskommunikation? Eine Befragung w\u00e4hren der 2. Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Gesundheitskommunikation der DGPuK. In: P. Stehr, D. Heinemeier & C. Rossmann (Hrsg.), Evidenzbasierte\/<\/em><\/a>evidenzinformierte Gesundheitskommunikation<\/a>, 19<\/em> (S. 47-59). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Data<\/a>Open Materials<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Steinmeyer, L., Betsch, C. & Renkewitz, F. (2018). K\u00f6nnen Faktenboxen den Einfluss narrativer Information auf Risikourteile verringern? In: P. Stehr, D. Heinemeier & C. Rossmann (Hrsg.), Evidenzbasierte\/<\/em>evidenzinformierte Gesundheitskommunikation<\/em><\/a>, 19<\/em> (S. 143-154). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Data<\/a>Open Materials<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wu, C. M., Schulz, E., Speekenbrink, M., Nelson, J.D., & Meder, B. (2018). Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision-spaces. Nature Human Behaviour<\/em>, 2, 915-924. Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

B\u00f6hm, R., Meier, N., Korn, L. & Betsch, C. (2017). Behavioural consequences of vaccination recommendations: an experimental analysis. Health Economics<\/em><\/a>, 26, 66-75. Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Betsch, C., B\u00f6hm, R., Korn, L., & Holtmann, C. (2017). On the benefits of explaining herd immunity in vaccine advocacy. Nature Human Behaviour,<\/em> doi<\/abbr>:10.1038\/s41562-017-0056.<\/a> Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Korn, L., Betsch, C., B\u00f6hm, R., & Meier, N. (2017). Communicating high vaccine rates of refugees: How the best intentions can lead to harm.<\/a> <\/em>The Lancet Infectious Diseases<\/em>, 17, 364\u2013365<\/a>. Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Schmid, P., Rauber, D., Betsch, C., Lidolt, G & Denker, M. (2017). Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior – A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005 – 2016. PLOS ONE<\/em>, 12(1):e0170550.doi:10.1371\/journal.pone.0170550 <\/a>Open Data <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meder, B. & Mayrhofer, R. (2017). Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information. Cognitive Psychology,<\/em> 96, 54\u201384. [shared first authorship] Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen, die Open Science o.\u00e4. zum Thema haben:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Renkewitz, F. & Heene, M. (Eds.). (2019). Open science in psychology: Progress and yet unsolved Problems [Topical Issue]. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Psychologie<\/a>, 227(4)<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Renkewitz, F. & Heene, M. (2019). The Replication Crisis and Open Science in Psychology: Methodological Challenges and Developments. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Psychologie<\/a>, 227, pp. 233-236.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Renkewitz, F., & Keiner, M. (2019). How to detect publication bias in psychological research? A comparative evaluation of six statistical methods. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Psychologie, <\/a>227<\/em>, 261-279. Open Data<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gl\u00f6ckner, A., Fiedler, S. & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft: Strategische Ausrichtung von Forschungsprozessen als Weg aus der Replikationskrise. Psychologische Rundschau<\/em>, 69<\/em>, 22 – 36.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Renkewitz, F. (2018). Die geschlossene Gesellschaft und ihre Freunde. In Stehr, P., Heinemann, D. & Rossmann, C. (Hrsg.), Evidenzbasierte | evidenzinformierte Gesundheitskommunikation<\/a><\/em> (S. 31-45). Baden-Baden: Nomos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Renkewitz, F. (2018). Probleme der klassischen Inferenzstatistik in der Forschungspraxis. In Sedlmeier, P. & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Forschungsmethoden und Statistik f\u00fcr Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. <\/em>(S. 613-648). M\u00fcnchen: Pearson Studium.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Renkewitz, F. (2018). Replikation, Pr\u00e4registrierung, Open Science. In Sedlmeier, P. & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Forschungsmethoden und Statistik f\u00fcr Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. <\/em>(S. 649-678). M\u00fcnchen: Pearson Studium.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.  Science<\/em>, 349(6251). DOI: 10.1126\/science.aac4716<\/a>*
* unter Beteiligung mehrerer damaliger und aktueller Mitglieder der Universit\u00e4t Erfurt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Renkewitz, F., Fuchs, H. M. & Fiedler, S. (2011). Is there evidence for publication biases in JDM research? Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8)<\/em>, 870-881.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen, in denen Open Science Praktiken angewandt wurden: Prochazka, F. & Obermaier, M. (2022). Trust through Transparency? How Journalistic Reactions to Media-Critical User Comments Affect Quality Perceptions and Behavior Intentions. Digital Journalism, 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/21670811.2021.2017316 Open Data: https:\/\/osf.io\/xqbu4\/ Asberger, J., Thomm, … Weiterlesen →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":337,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44\/revisions\/337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/efosi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}