{"id":206,"date":"2019-07-05T15:15:17","date_gmt":"2019-07-05T13:15:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/?p=206"},"modified":"2019-07-05T15:15:17","modified_gmt":"2019-07-05T13:15:17","slug":"asuman-laetzer-lasar-is-going-to-present-a-working-paper-on-religious-ancient-placemaking-first-draft-of-a-conceptual-framework","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/2019\/07\/05\/asuman-laetzer-lasar-is-going-to-present-a-working-paper-on-religious-ancient-placemaking-first-draft-of-a-conceptual-framework\/","title":{"rendered":"Asuman L\u00e4tzer-Lasar is going to present a working paper on &#8218;Religious Ancient Placemaking \u2013 first draft of a conceptual framework&#8216;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The choice of location of a sanctuary was mainly dependent on its sacred<br>\ngeomancy, for instance recognized through an augurium during the<br>\nRoman period. However, in dense and crowded places such as a city, there<br>\nwere also other needs and requirements that had to be respected, such as<br>\nurban topography, infrastructure and accessibility, as well as policy,<br>\neconomy, local legislation, or even traditions. Establishing a place for<br>\nreligious communication, be it a sanctuary, a grave or the erection of a<br>\ndedication for a deity therefore had to be some kind of a negotiation<br>\nbetween the religious communicator and the physical and non-physical<br>\npre-existing environment.<br>\nHowever, even in antiquity the establishment of places of religious<br>\ncommunication in dense and diversely crowded cities cannot have been<br>\ntaken place as mere top-down processes decided only by elite, ruling<br>\nactors without taking any significant and urban-related factors into<br>\naccount. I argue that the decision-making process, when creating a place<br>\nfor religious communication, is an interplay of spaces, objects, actors,<br>\npractices and imagination (which is aspirations and semantics) that lead<br>\ninvoluntarily to reciprocal formations.<br>\nThis paper is a first attempt to describe the term \u201cplacemaking\u201d, which<br>\nderives from the disciplines of urban planning and geography, in order to<br>\nelucidate its advantages and disadvantages for the research of ancient<br>\ncities and religions. I would like to apply the term and specify it as the<br>\nconcept of Religious Ancient Placemaking. In this paper I will introduce<br>\na first sketch of my understanding of the theoretical framework of the<br>\nconcept, which shall be part of my habilitation project.<br>\nMy plan for the second book is firstly to develop the concept and make it<br>\nsuitable for the discipline of archaeology, then secondly enrich it with<br>\nexamples from the ancient city of Rome \u2013 because it is an exceptional city<br>\nthat provides a plethora of material and written sources and therefore<br>\nguarantees a qualitative broad variety of phenomena \u2013 and then thirdly try<br>\nto apply the conceptual framework on a specific case study, which will be<br>\nthe Provincia Hispania.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The choice of location of a sanctuary was mainly dependent on its sacred geomancy, for instance recognized through an augurium during the Roman period. However, in dense and crowded places such as a city, there were also other needs and requirements that had to be respected, such as urban topography, infrastructure and accessibility, as well &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/2019\/07\/05\/asuman-laetzer-lasar-is-going-to-present-a-working-paper-on-religious-ancient-placemaking-first-draft-of-a-conceptual-framework\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8222;Asuman L\u00e4tzer-Lasar is going to present a working paper on &#8218;Religious Ancient Placemaking \u2013 first draft of a conceptual framework&#8216;&#8220; <\/span>weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[182,179,181,183,180],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":207,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206\/revisions\/207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}