{"id":285,"date":"2020-01-14T13:06:13","date_gmt":"2020-01-14T12:06:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/?p=285"},"modified":"2020-01-14T13:06:13","modified_gmt":"2020-01-14T12:06:13","slug":"emilia-jamroziak-presents-a-working-paper-on-the-linear-construction-of-monastic-history-in-the-modern-historiography-what-are-its-consequences-and-is-there-any-alternative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/2020\/01\/14\/emilia-jamroziak-presents-a-working-paper-on-the-linear-construction-of-monastic-history-in-the-modern-historiography-what-are-its-consequences-and-is-there-any-alternative\/","title":{"rendered":"Emilia Jamroziak presents a working paper on &#8218;The linear construction of monastic history in the modern historiography: what are its consequences and is there any alternative?&#8216;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>This project aims to explain key historiographical processes that  history of medieval monasticism has been the subject to from the  nineteenth-century onwards. Far from being marginal, the modern  historiography of medievall monasticism is a powerful test-case for a  wider understanding of the interpretational processes of history,  meta-levels of historiographical developments as well as opportunities  of the transcultural approaches that emerged in the recent years.  Although monasticism has late Antiquity roots and long post-medieval  histories, the medieval period is the formative one and has been studied  with particular intensity. It is frequently used as a stage that not  only shaped but also defined this phenomenon. The \u2018tyranny\u2019 of origins  has affected the historiography of medieval monasticism to a great  extent and continues to do so. The value attached to \u2013 or rejection of \u2013  monastic heritage has been shaped in significant ways by how the  history of monasticism has been incorporated into linear histories of  nation-states. The confessional perspectives \u2013 Catholic and Protestant  were very important in shaping western-European historiography in the  nineteenth and the first half of the twentieth century. The resent  resurgence of the confessionally-driven interpretations in parts of  East-Central Europe (especially Poland, Croatia and Hungary) and its  impact on the approaches to the medieval monastic history are crucial  for the wider understanding of contemporary identities and the place  that medieval history has within \u2018politics of history\u2019. Since the  development of the academic study of monasticism, the trans-European  monastic networks have been routinely studied from the perspective of  modern political borders and subjecting it to the specific periodisation  concerns as well as set of questions that removed or diminished agency  of such communities vis-\u00e0-vis political structures. In most extreme  versions it had led to the models that removed the religious component  from the analysis altogether. The powerful image of rationality and  economic planning, as well as seeing strategic innovations in the  monastic structures have been central to the Weberian-inspired models of  interpretation. Whilst economy-focused approaches largely disappeared  by the late-twentieth century, the models that interpret monastic  structures and many elements of monastic culture as a precursor of  modern rationality, often using the terminology of \n\u2018innovation\u2019 remained, at meta-level, anchored in the concept of \nprogress and development.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This project aims to explain key historiographical processes that history of medieval monasticism has been the subject to from the nineteenth-century onwards. Far from being marginal, the modern historiography of medievall monasticism is a powerful test-case for a wider understanding of the interpretational processes of history, meta-levels of historiographical developments as well as opportunities of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/2020\/01\/14\/emilia-jamroziak-presents-a-working-paper-on-the-linear-construction-of-monastic-history-in-the-modern-historiography-what-are-its-consequences-and-is-there-any-alternative\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8222;Emilia Jamroziak presents a working paper on &#8218;The linear construction of monastic history in the modern historiography: what are its consequences and is there any alternative?&#8216;&#8220; <\/span>weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[314,313,312,315],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=285"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":286,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285\/revisions\/286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}