{"id":287,"date":"2020-01-16T10:19:29","date_gmt":"2020-01-16T09:19:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/?p=287"},"modified":"2020-01-16T10:21:04","modified_gmt":"2020-01-16T09:21:04","slug":"call-for-papers-beyond-the-timeline-how-to-write-history-for-example-of-the-middle-ages-in-different-ways","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/2020\/01\/16\/call-for-papers-beyond-the-timeline-how-to-write-history-for-example-of-the-middle-ages-in-different-ways\/","title":{"rendered":"Call for Papers &#8218;Beyond the timeline: How to write History (for example of the Middle Ages) in different ways&#8216;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p> It is part of human  experience  that  developments  happen  from  earlier to later  stages.  Hence,  the courses of these  developments are usually  written  from  the  time  that  has  longer  gone to those times that are closer to us. Such a chronologically progressing historiography is generally accepted,though  theoretically and methodologically  admitted  that  researching  narrating  the  past  always happens from a present by looking backwards into the past. The question then can be raised to what extent it is  reflected, that such a chronological account implies a kind of causally determined history of reception inaddition to the impact our own, contemporary viewpoints have. The historian of early Christianity and the medieval times, Markus Vinzent has recently criticised this type of historiography of reception of the past. In his book of the year 2019 &#8218;Writing the History of Early Christianity. From Reception to Retrospection&#8216; (Cambridge University Press) Vinzent introduces the  perspective of<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>retrospection as a  criticial  method of historiography  and  exemplifies  this by several  showcases  from  the\u2018beginnings\u2019of Christianity.  One of the  basic  ideas of retrospection is that writing history must by necessity be progressive (as all our thinking and writing is progressive),while its (re-)construction is always done in a regressive mode, working anachronologically against the  timeline. If  this is recognised, continuities and linearities  disappear. Vinzent\u2018s historiographical method of retrospection  dissolves  the  difference  between  sources  (oranoriginal,  authoritativereference text) and secondary literature and questions past authorities (auctoritates). Retrospection rather foregrounds the author of the historiographical production as subject of history which targets different objects of the past. Does retrospection mean,we should simply turn back the time line and alter the direction of writing history,or what changes when we approach history deliberately anachronologically? Can we give up\u2013without the loss of a critical instance\u2013the difference between sources and interpretations? Are not timelines and chronologies essential elements of the work of historians? <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Beyond  a  chronologically  oriented  historiography,  the  workshop  will  explore  examples  from  the Middle Ages (not only, however) to discuss several methods and forms of historiography. Potential topics could be: (1)Into which directionof time shouldwe write? What impact does the timeline have in narrating history? Can we,an dif  so, how can we alter the direction of writing history?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(2)Beyond the timeline:   What is the   meaning of time in historiographical   concepts?   What differences  does  retrospection  make in historiography?  How  can  one  write  retrospectively? Writing retrospectively, does it  lead to novel forms of history (particulary of the Middle Ages)?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(3)Narrativity and time:   What   additional   insights do weget   from   narrative   elements in historiographical   productions?   What is the   meaning of Flashbacks and Flashforwards in narrating  history?  What do we learn  from  contrafactual or virtual history?  What  happens, if historians become agents of history?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The  workshop  invites  contributions  from  history,  literature,  cultural  studies,  philosophy,  religious studies, cultural anthropology, sociology and related subjects. We particularly invite young scholars to contribute to the workshop. The workshop will be based on pre-circulated papers. In these contributions which will be distributed to the conference participants at the latest a fortnight before  the workshop. During the workshop the papers shall be introduced by their authors and will then discussed. The evening lecture will be given by Prof. Dr. Markus Vinzent who is  going to present his new book. Please  submit  your  paper  proposal  with an abstract (ca.  500 words).  Abstracts and papers can be presented in German or English and will be discussed in both languages. We are working towards a third party funding of the workshop. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For more information: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uni-erfurt.de\/fileadmin\/public-docs\/Mittelalter_Geschichte\/CfP_english_Workshop_Jenseits_des_Zeitrahls.pdf\">https:\/\/www.uni-erfurt.de\/fileadmin\/public-docs\/Mittelalter_Geschichte\/CfP_english_Workshop_Jenseits_des_Zeitrahls.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uni-erfurt.de\/fileadmin\/public-docs\/Mittelalter_Geschichte\/CfP_deutsch_Workshop_Jenseits_des_Zeitstrahls.pdf\">https:\/\/www.uni-erfurt.de\/fileadmin\/public-docs\/Mittelalter_Geschichte\/CfP_deutsch_Workshop_Jenseits_des_Zeitstrahls.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is part of human experience that developments happen from earlier to later stages. Hence, the courses of these developments are usually written from the time that has longer gone to those times that are closer to us. Such a chronologically progressing historiography is generally accepted,though theoretically and methodologically admitted that researching narrating the past &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/2020\/01\/16\/call-for-papers-beyond-the-timeline-how-to-write-history-for-example-of-the-middle-ages-in-different-ways\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8222;Call for Papers &#8218;Beyond the timeline: How to write History (for example of the Middle Ages) in different ways&#8216;&#8220; <\/span>weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[73],"tags":[318,319,316,317],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=287"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":290,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287\/revisions\/290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}