In the 13. Chapter of the dissertation I am going to show in four \nsteps why Hegel makes an internal connection between the logic of the \nnegative-infinite judgement and the Philosophy of Law. My thesis is, \nthat it is crucial to understand the internal connection between the \nnegative-infinite judgement on the one side and the modern form of the \nlaw on the other side in order to think a radical form of non-legal \nresistance. With non-legal resistance I am going to conceptualise a \nresistance beyond the law. In this line of thought I distinguish \nresistance that cannot be punished and resistance that can be punished. \nThe act of the hero cannot be punished because the hero creates a new \nlaw. To be a hero means to be a law-giver. Heroes are only possible in \nantiquity. The act of the criminal, in contrast, can be punished, \nbecause the criminal presupposes a law already running up. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Every\n hero in modernity is in the position of the criminal in transgressing \nthe law. Starting from this distinction, I will show that we have to \nthink non-legal resistance differently in order to understand liberation\n in social struggles. Because resistance in modernity can just reproduce\n an order of domination and injustice, if resistance is not able to \nfound an autonomous order of equal participation within social \npractices. Non-legal resistance takes places if the subject is able to \njustify action guiding rules only by itself. But the very act of \njustification of action guiding rules presupposes law like rules and \novercomes them at the same time. This conceptualisation allows me to \nthink a non-legal resistance which not just reiterates an order of \nsocial domination in the very form of resistance. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In the 13. Chapter of the dissertation I am going to show in four steps why Hegel makes an internal connection between the logic of the negative-infinite judgement and the Philosophy of Law. My thesis is, that it is crucial to understand the internal connection between the negative-infinite judgement on the one side and the … „Marcus D\u00f6ller presents a working paper on ‚What does it mean to resist against the law as law?‘“ <\/span>weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[362,8,364,363,140],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=318"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":320,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318\/revisions\/320"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projekte.uni-erfurt.de\/maxweberkolleg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}